After discussing it more with folks here, is seems to us that perhaps for the uDAPL user-mode library, it be provided to openib.org under a dual BSD + LGPL library rather than a BSD + GPL since people normally want to use LGPL for libraries.
Why not consider a more open license still, one that allows free commercial or non-commercial use such as the boost license ( http://www.boost.org/more/license_info.html ). Is there anything to lose by adopting an even less restrictive license?
Paul
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
