Thanks Brian
>
> Per the IBA spec, the selection of a master SM is determined by the
> GUID (lowest wins). When OpenSM does its comparison, it does not adjust
> for the endian of the host. For our x86 systems, this means the
> comparison is based on the byte-swapped value of the GUID. It looks
> like the patch below is in order. Is that correct?
>
> --- osm_sminfo_rcv.c 3 Feb 2005 19:33:39 -0000 1.2.2.3
> +++ osm_sminfo_rcv.c 16 Feb 2005 23:13:39 -0000
> @@ -173,7 +173,8 @@ __osm_sminfo_rcv_remote_sm_is_higher (
> if( ib_sminfo_get_priority( p_remote_sm ) ==
> p_rcv->p_subn->opt.sm_priority )
> {
> - if( p_remote_sm->guid < p_rcv->p_subn->sm_port_guid )
> + if( cl_ntoh64( p_remote_sm->guid ) <
> + cl_ntoh64( p_rcv->p_subn->sm_port_guid ) )
> {
> return( TRUE );
> }
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openib-general mailing list
> openib-general@openib.org
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
