On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 10:24:13AM -0800, Tom Duffy wrote: > On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 12:43 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Author: roland > > Date: 2005-03-31 12:43:29 -0800 (Thu, 31 Mar 2005) > > New Revision: 2101 > > > > Added: > > gen2/trunk/src/linux-kernel/patches/linux-2.6.11-sinai.diff > > Log: > > Add patch adding Sinai device IDs for 2.6.11 kernel. > > Roland, please consider applying this for svn ease of use:
No - I think Rolan is doing the right thing with a seperate patch. I ran into the same issue since I'm still poking at 2.6.11. By keeping "backport" patches seperate distro's will have an easier time figuring out which backport cruft they will need for their release. And Roland won't have to remember to clean it out later and won't cause pain for distro's when they grab a new version of openib but still shipping the same base release. grant _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
