On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 16:37 -0700, Tom Duffy wrote: > On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 16:31 -0700, Fab Tillier wrote: > > Isn't the above change backwards? The original code was copying settings > > from listen_sk to sk, and the new code seems to be checking flags in sk to > > determine whether to set them in listen_sk. > > You are so right. My brain ain't on today or something.
You know what, cancel this whole patch. I have it wrong, and I am reworking a new patch to work with the new sk_alloc(). -tduffy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
