I believe that an IT-API it_ep_accept() supplies private data that it expects to be delivered to its peer when the three-way handshake option is selected.
DAT only exposes a two-way handshake, so there it never requires private data on the RTU. I don't know if any IT-API applications actually require the three-way handshake. On 5/18/05, Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do any applications make use of the private data in these CM message: RTU, > MRA, or DREP? I'm doubtful of the RTU or DREP, but not as sure of the MRA. > > Since no replies are generated in response to these messages, the CM does > not keep them after their sends complete. However, it may need to resend > the messages. For example, it will resend the RTU if a duplicate REP is > received. > > If no applications are using the private data, I will not worry about > storing the private data for the retransmissions at this time. > > - Sean > _______________________________________________ > openib-general mailing list > openib-general@openib.org > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general