> in case someone's firmware is less accurate than HP's.
> Shirley, did the patch to get_clock.c fix the problem?

Cycles is not equal to the clock rate. If you have a processor with internal doubling or pipelining or whatever, the clock rate isn't the same.

> Maybe there shall be a separate utility to compare
> get_cycles and gettimeofday results, may be useful for debug.
>
> Anyway, if get_cpu_mhz isnt reliable people can just dump raw
> cycles data and do the math outside the tool.


Agree if the rdma_lat, and rdma_bw are only used for debugging/regression testing not for performance measurement.

Thanks
Shirley Ma
IBM Linux Technology Center
15300 SW Koll Parkway
Beaverton, OR 97006-6063
Phone(Fax): (503) 578-7638

_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to