On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 11:28 -0700, Libor Michalek wrote: > Looks good, but I do have one question, why did you move the clearing > of 'struct sock' from 'struct socket' to the end of the function? > Specifically if we are waiting on linger during the release I don't > think we want sock to have an sk, this avoids having any other user > system calls on this socket. This is done the same way in af_inet.c, > the clear comes before the close/linger...
I moved it recently, earlier versions of the patch didn't do that. You
can move it back if needed. I was trying to trace down a close bug, and
this did not fix it. So, final answer is: keep it the way it was.
-tduffy
--
I wish we lived in the America of yesteryear that only exists in the
minds of us Republicans.
-- Ned Flanders
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
