> From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 11:47 AM > I think I see what is going on here... > > In user_mad.c::send_handler > > > if (send_wc->status == IB_WC_RESP_TIMEOUT_ERR) { > packet->mad.hdr.status = ETIMEDOUT; > > if (!queue_packet(file, agent, packet)) > return; > } > > That is what is causing the problem. I think the send side queues the > packet on a timeout and simulates a receive so that a transaction can be > terminated. RMPP sends appear to be a little different in that even non > transactions get timeouts.
Why is a receive generated at all? Shouldn't the send completion be enough? It seems odd to just generate a receive indication with the sent data when really, nothing was received. From an app perspective, it seems that handling the IB_WC_RESP_TIMEOUT_ERR case should be sufficient to indicate the transaction is complete. - Fab _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general