On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 09:44:18PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > The current sdp_conn_put/sdp_conn_hold implementation > > seems to be subject to the following race condition: > > Libor, did you have the time to review this patch?
Yes, looks good. The only question I had was about making sdp_conn_put an inline, and calling to destruct only on the last decrement. Basically split the sdp_conn_put code in your patch, where sdp_conn_put is everything before the unlock of sock_lock, and destruct is everything after. Was there any reason you didn't do that? Is there a reasont to split it like this... Looks like all the right places have _light(). -Libor _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
