I think that a trunk directory will be more meaningful, as for the naming convention I also agree that we should match the kernel or userspace tree structure
-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Hefty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 7:35 PM
To: 'Hal Rosenstock'; Amit Krig
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [openib-general] InfiniBand Test Project === IBTP ===
>> The proposed new dir can be under Gen2/trunk =>
>>
>> https://openib.org/svn/gen2/trunk/ibtp/
My preference would be to place it until a test or existing util directory, rather than trunk directly.
>> * core
>> * ulps
>> * ipoib
>> * sdp
>> * srp
>> * kdapl
>> * iser
>
>The indentation of this looks wrong to me. core and ulps at the same
>level in the tree; everything else below ulps. Should it be ulps or ulp
>as in the actual kernel tree ?
I agree that matching the kernel or userspace tree structure would be better.
- Sean
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
