James> Does the ib_req_notify_cq() kernel verb conform the
James> definition of the Request Completion Notification in
James> section 11.4.2.2 of the IBTA spec?
James> Specifically, is the handler only guaranteed to be called
James> after the next completion entry is added?
Yes, I think these should be semantics we assume.
James> I understand that Mellanox hardware can generate
James> notification if there are already completions on the CQ,
James> but I want to avoid using any hardware specific features.
I agree - we should not assume the stronger Mellanox semantics.
- R.
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
