> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Michael S. Tsirkin > Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 1:19 PM > To: Roland Dreier > Cc: openib-general@openib.org > Subject: [openib-general] Re: RDMA Generic Connection Management >
> > I think that yes: > APM might be one good reason to want to get more than one > path, would it not? > But you would have to define automatic path migration in generic/transport neutral terms. I've actually come up with some definitions that are inclusive of IB and SCTP, but a definition of Automatic Path Migration that includes TCP isn't going to be very meaningul since the migration of a TCP connection occurs one layer lower than for IB. If APM can only be defined for IB then it does not have to be addressed in the generic interface. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
