Roland We're planning to go back with a new submission which addresses the concerns that were directly relevant to the patch itself. In the process, we'll be porting the patch to 2.6.14.
A couple of comments: If one were to look at the patch in its current form, you'd find that it is already quite minimal compared to the changes needed for 10GE TCP/IP alternatives. The architecture that we propose also accommodates different TOE approaches, e.g. different connection setup models, etc. We currently have the proposed architecture running on Linux in conjunction with a regular NIC, iWARP RNIC, and iSCSI HBA. Finally, with the new submission, we're hoping to get a more constructive dialogue going, which focuses on the patch itself, because it is clear that there is user interest in the technology, and Linux support would be beneficial to all parties. 'Asgeir > -----Original Message----- > From: Roland Dreier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 9:24 AM > To: Asgeir Eiriksson > Cc: openib-general@openib.org > Subject: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH][iWARP] Added provider CM verbs > andquery provider methods > > Asgeir> ...this is the approach taken in the Chelsio TOE patches > Asgeir> that we have submitted. > > What are your plans for these patches? I am not subscribed to netdev, > but from reading the archives, it seems that your most recent > submission was rejected quite strongly. > > - R. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
