On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 14:21 -0700, Sean Hefty wrote: > Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > How is this different from what we have with ib_verbs now? > With ib_verbs, users receive notification of device addition/removal. > This interface doesn't require receiving that notification.
Why should it be part of the interface ? > This opens up the possibility for a user to receive a reference to a > device that they may not have received previous notification for. > Similarly, the device could have been removed before the call returned, > making the pointer invalid. I don't understand the difference between handling a device received in cma_get_device and device received in ib_client.add ... Guy _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
