On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 12:55, Sean Hefty wrote: > Guy German wrote: > > I believe that ib_at is still a valuable module even if ATS reverse ARP > > is broken, and I think we should discuss this. > > Here's my thinking on this. ATS is broken as you mentioned for reverse > lookups. > However, if we want to keep ATS, I think that ATS > registration/deregistration > should be integrated with IPoIB.
There was a desire expressed a long time ago to keep these separate. > To keep it separate, we will need to patch > net_device to provide an rdma_ptr as suggested by Roland. This is also needed by SDP currently. -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
