Arkady,
Intel MPI (real consumer of uDAPL) has no
problem with this change.
-arlin
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kanevsky, Arkady
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005
6:40 AM
To: Grant Grundler; Caitlin
Bestler
Cc: Roland Dreier;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
openib-general@openib.org
Subject: [dat-discussions] RE:
[openib-general] Re: iWARP emulation protocol
Grant,
The developers of the application(s) in questions
are aware of the
discussion.
I will leave it to them to respond.
I bring the discussion point at the weekly DAT
Collaborative meeting
which we have every Wednesday.
I appologize that the DAT Collaborative charter
does not allow
to submit contribution without joining DAT
Collaborative.
But this is no different from Linux not accepting
any contrubutions
without proper license.
Byt be rest assure that as a Chair I bring the
concerns
and suggestions stated in email discussion at the
DAT meetings.
Arkady
Arkady
Kanevsky
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network
Appliance
phone: 781-768-5395
375
Totten Pond Rd.
Fax: 781-895-1195
Waltham, MA 02451-2010
central phone: 781-768-5300
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Grant Grundler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 8:02 PM
> To: Caitlin Bestler
> Cc: Grant Grundler; Roland Dreier; Kanevsky, Arkady;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
> openib-general@openib.org
> Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: iWARP
emulation protocol
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 04:40:54PM -0700,
Caitlin Bestler wrote:
> > > Roland (and the rest of us) would
like to see someone name a
> > > real consumer of the proposed
interface. ie who depends on
> > > this change?
> > > Then the dependency for that
use/user can be discussed and
> > > appropriate tradeoffs made. Make
sense?
> >
> > Unfortunately not every application that
is under
> development, or even
> > deployed, can be discussed in a
google-searchable public
> forum. That
> > especially applies to user-mode
development.
>
> Well, this is open source. While I don't want
to preclude
> closed source developement, it's usually
necessary to have an
> open source consumer that any open source
developer can test with.
>
> > So I could have actually tested such
applications and still not be
> > free to cite them here.
>
> Understood. I'm not asking *you* to cite one
unless you
> happen to own one of the consumers.
>
> > With any luck some of them
> > are following the discussion and will
jump in on their own.
> > Unfortunately, since they are developing
to uDAPL they are
> unlikely to
> > be following this discussion.
>
> It doesn't help that the DAT yahoo-groups.com
mailing list is
> rejecting my replies. It would be
helpful if someone
> following this forum could share Roland's
question with DAT
> mailing list if it didn't make it there
already and possibly
> explain why naming a consumer is necessary.
>
> hth,
> grant
>
YAHOO!
GROUPS LINKS
|
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
