On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 11:03, James Lentini wrote: > On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > mst> I think this list scan needs some kind of protection. > mst> The following is what I checked in. Does this needs to be updated > mst> in other places as well? > > I agree that SDP must also obtain the dev_base_lock.
I think this was directed at the patch I supplied. I mistakenly left that out. I think the code Michael committed in sdp_link.c obtains the dev_base_lock appropriately. -- Hal > The update to IBAT, on which the SDP patch was based, used the > dev_base_lock (svn diff -r 3317:3547 core/at.c). > > The dev_base list isn't searched in any other places. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
