The updated proposal will have IP addresses and TCP ports of src and dst in private data.
How TCP ports are mapped to IB service IDs is a separate proposal. Arkady Kanevsky email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Appliance phone: 781-768-5395 375 Totten Pond Rd. Fax: 781-895-1195 Waltham, MA 02451-2010 central phone: 781-768-5300 > -----Original Message----- > From: Sean Hefty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 11:51 AM > To: Kanevsky, Arkady > Cc: Richard Frank; Lentini, James; Roland Dreier; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; openib-general@openib.org; Davis, Arlin R > Subject: Re: [dat-discussions] RE: [openib-general] Re: iWARP > emulationprotocol > > > Kanevsky, Arkady wrote: > > I will update the proposal for IBTA based on this feedback and all > > other feedback posted. I will still separate private data usage > > proposal and port mapping one. > > Again, I think that these should be in the same proposal. > The CM REQ carries > the IB transport layer address. The goal here is to map > another transport layer > address to the IB one. The source port is included in the > private data. By not > including the destination port, there's an assumption that > it's provided > somewhere else in the CM REQ. We should either make this > explicit, or put the > destination port in the private data as well. > > - Sean > _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
