Why does an application care whether the remote implementation supports
ZB? Whether memory regions can be described with zero based rkeys or
not doesn't matter on an end-to-end level. Its only a local issue. So
ZB shouldn't be there IMO.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Tucker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kanevsky, Arkady" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <openib-general@openib.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 4:55 PM
Subject: RE: [openib-general] round 2 - proposal for socket
basedconnection model
Arkady:
I may actually have a constructive comment about the protocol (private
data format). One thing I noticed is that *almost* everything in the
private data header is available in the native iWARP protocol header
except the ZB and SI bits. If these bits become part of the canonical
private data header, then does that require an iWARP transport to use
the header too even though only two bits are useful?
Sorry if this is a dumb question,
Tom
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 16:40 -0500, Tom Tucker wrote:
Arkady:
I don't think anyone disagrees with your goals. Unfortunately
additional
requirements on the implementation were coupled with the
specification
of the private data format (protocol). This peripheral discussion
derailed any attempt to discuss the protocol.
Attempts to separate the protocol discussion from the implementation
failed. And so here we are...
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 15:38 -0400, Kanevsky, Arkady wrote:
> What are you trying to achieve?
>
> I am trying to define an IB REQ protocol extension that
> support IP connection 5-tuple exchange between connection
> requestor and responder.
> And define mapping between IP 5-tuple and IB entities.
>
> That way ULP which was written to TCP/IP, UDP/IP, CSTP/IP (and so
> on)
> can use RDMA transport without change.
> To modify ULP to know that it runs on top of IB vs. iWARP
> vs. (any other RDMA transport) is bad idea.
> It is one thing to choose proper port to connect.
> Completely different to ask ULP to parse private data
> in transport specific way.
>
> The same protocol must support both user level ULPs
> and kernel level ULPs.
> Arkady
>
> Arkady Kanevsky email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Network Appliance phone: 781-768-5395
> 375 Totten Pond Rd. Fax: 781-895-1195
> Waltham, MA 02451-2010 central phone: 781-768-5300
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sean Hefty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 3:22 PM
> > To: Kanevsky, Arkady
> > Cc: Sean Hefty; openib-general@openib.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [openib-general] round 2 - proposal for socket
> > based connectionmodel
> >
> >
> > Kanevsky, Arkady wrote:
> > > Sean,
> > > answers in-line.
> > > Arkady
> >
> > At this point, I'm just going to disagree with this approach
> > and move on with
> > the current implementation of the CMA. What's needed is a
> > service that provides
> > IB connections using TCP/IP addressing. I don't believe this
> > proposal meets
> > this goal.
> >
> > To meet the requirement of connecting over IB using TCP/IP
> > addressing, I believe
> > that we need a service with a reserved service identifier or
> > range of
> > identifiers, a mechanism for mapping between IP and IB
> > addresses, and a
> > mechanism for reversing the mapping.
> >
> > I don't see where the proposal addresses the bulk of the work
> > that's required,
> > nor do I think that it will present an API to the user that
> > does not expose IB
> > related addressing (such as service IDs).
> >
> > - Sean
> >
> _______________________________________________
> openib-general mailing list
> openib-general@openib.org
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
