On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 09:51:48AM -0500, James Lentini wrote: > ... > > > Procs per node uDapl/Sdp Rds > > > 2 19996 9999 > > > 4 39984 9999 > > > > > > Clearly, there is tradeoff in performance as we go from uDapl/Sdp to > > > Rds. > ... > > This isn't an apples to apples comparison. uDAPL is an API and RDS is > > a protocol. > > I thought he was comparing SDP (using uDAPL) vs RDS. > Did I read that wrong? I think so. I'll let Ranjit clarify. To the best of my knowledge, SDP has never been implemented on uDAPL. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
