On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 01:57:06PM -0800, Michael Krause wrote: > What you indicate above is that RDS > will implement a resync of the two sides of the association to determine > what has been successfully sent.
More accurate to say that it "could" implement that. I'm just kibbutzing on someone else's proposal. > This then implies that the reliability of the underlying > interconnect isn't as critical per se as the end-to-end RDS protocol > will assure that data is delivered to the RDS components in the face > of hardware failures. Correct? Yes. That's the intent that I see in the proposal. The implementation required to actually support this may not be what the proposers had in mind. This sort of message service, by the way, has a long history in distributed computing. -- greg _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
