Michael> Maybe its a naming thing? We can call the list
Michael> "iterator", does this make it less ugly?
I thought about this, but it feels like overkill for something pretty
simple. So how about just doing
/* put list of devices in list and return length of list */
extern int ibv_get_device_list(struct ibv_device * const **list);
/* free a list of devices from ibv_get_device_list */
extern void ibv_free_device_list(struct ibv_device * const *list);
which could be used as:
struct ibv_device * const *list;
int list_len;
list_len = ibv_get_device_list(&list);
/* ... */
ibv_free_device_list(list);
Or are the consts too confusing? Should we be a little less safe but
make it nice and simple and just do
extern int ibv_get_device_list(struct ibv_device ***list);
and so on?
- R.
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
