On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 15:55, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > But now we only do the list walk if the ip route resolution returns > > > a loopback device, so we are ok, right? > > > > That's the way it seems to me (at least for SDP but not CMA (addr)). > > OK, Sean, do you want to cook up a patch for CMA based on this code of mine? > I could do it too but I dont have a way to test cma yet.
It's used in 2 ways in addr.c from what I can see. One is for the local address, the other not. So I'm not sure the same thing can be done here. -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
