Hi Hal, I think we need to stick to the IB spec terminology. Since the spec did not change and only added some note describing the change we probably just need to add such comment too.
I can see people looking at the sa_key and trying to find it in the spec... Eitan Eitan Zahavi Design Technology Director Mellanox Technologies LTD Tel:+972-4-9097208 Fax:+972-4-9593245 P.O. Box 586 Yokneam 20692 ISRAEL > -----Original Message----- > From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 5:27 PM > To: Eitan Zahavi; Yael Kalka > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Separating SA and SM Keys > > Hi, > > In order to support separate SA and SM keys and make this clearer, I > propose to change ib_types.h as follows. > > -- Hal > > Index: ib_types.h > =================================================================== > --- ib_types.h (revision 4540) > +++ ib_types.h (working copy) > @@ -3618,7 +3618,7 @@ typedef struct _ib_sa_mad > ib_net32_t seg_num; > ib_net32_t paylen_newwin; > > - ib_net64_t sm_key; > + ib_net64_t sa_key; > > ib_net16_t attr_offset; > ib_net16_t resv3; _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
