Arlin Davis wrote:
Kanevsky, Arkady wrote:
5. Memory protection extension for atomic operations
6. error returns for extensions?
yes and yes; I will work these into the next patch and update the
proposal.
For error returns I am thinking about carving up the return type, adding
a new mask, and extension get type macro. Suggestions on carving up the
following? Carve into type or subtype? other suggestions?
type: DAT_RETURN_CLASS DAT_RETURN_TYPE DAT_RETURN_SUBTYPE
bits: 31-30
29-16 15-0
-arlin
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
