[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Steve Wise wrote: >> Is it possible to just go ahead and push the core iwarp stuff into >> kernel.org? > > I don't think that makes sense or would be accepted. This > would be asking for changes to the kernel code that nothing else in > the kernel would use. >
But there are solid precedents for creating an extensible/flexible interface even if there is only a single user of that interface currently. For example the scsi_transport_iscsi defines an very general interface to an iscsi transport layer even though iscsi_tcp is the only instantiation of that transport. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
