On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 17:05, Sean Hefty wrote: > Sean Hefty wrote: > > The RMPP code actually checks the active flag before checking the version, > > which > > is wrong, but why this has gone undetected. > > On second thought, and checking the spec in more detail... > > o13-21.1.3: States that if Active=0, all other fields shall be reserved. > > and > > o13-21.1.4: Adds that version shall have a value of 1 in all MADs where > Active=1. > > Given this, I think that the current code _is_ correct. It's the spec that's > seems broken...
Guess the active bit needs to always stay the same regardless of the RMPP version. -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
