> enum ib_device_cap_flags {
>@@ -86,6 +87,14 @@
> IB_DEVICE_RC_RNR_NAK_GEN = (1<<12),
> IB_DEVICE_SRQ_RESIZE = (1<<13),
> IB_DEVICE_N_NOTIFY_CQ = (1<<14),
>+ IB_DEVICE_IN_ORD_PLCMNT = (1<<15),
>+ IB_DEVICE_ZERO_STAG = (1<<16),
>+ IB_DEVICE_SEND_W_INV = (1<<17),
>+ IB_DEVICE_MW = (1<<18),
>+ IB_DEVICE_FMR = (1<<19),
>+ IB_DEVICE_SRQ = (1<<20),
>+ IB_DEVICE_ARP = (1<<21),
>+ IB_DEVICE_LLP = (1<<22),
> };
I have a couple of questions below, but does anyone object to this
portion of this patch (with some possible renaming)?
Does in order placement indicate that a technique that polls memory can
be used to determine if remote data has been received?
Can you also describe how a user would use ARP and LLP flags?
- Sean
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
