On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 08:31, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > On 18:13 Wed 01 Feb , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 17:59, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > > > On 14:41 Mon 30 Jan , Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > Quoting r. Yael Kalka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > =================================================================== > > > > > --- include/opensm/osm_svn_revision.h (revision 5203) > > > > > +++ include/opensm/osm_svn_revision.h (working copy) > > > > > @@ -1 +1 @@ > > > > > -#define OSM_SVN_REVISION "" > > > > > +#define OSM_SVN_REVISION "5203M" > > > > > > > > This looks like a mistake. > > > > And, I think this shows that keeping the generated file > > > > osm_svn_revision.h > > > > represents a problem. > > > > > > Good point. Hal, could we svn-remove this file? > > > > Yes, this is possible but there is a little more work involved here as > > the OSM_SVN_REVISION is checked for length 0 to determine whether to > > print out the svn version message right now. > > It is ok. What I mean (and believe Michael too) is to not store > osm_svn_revision.h under SVN, but generate in build time. Like this:
Got it. Thanks. Applied. -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
