All 3 options: proposed APIs, extensions, or IB semantic API all provide the same performance benefit on IB. But the last option is the easiest to use.
Arkady Kanevsky email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Appliance Inc. phone: 781-768-5395 1601 Trapelo Rd. - Suite 16. Fax: 781-895-1195 Waltham, MA 02451 central phone: 781-768-5300 > -----Original Message----- > From: Sean Hefty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 11:12 AM > To: Kanevsky, Arkady; Caitlin Bestler; Larsen, Roy K; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sean Hefty > Cc: openib-general@openib.org > Subject: RE: [dat-discussions] [openib-general] [RFC] DAT > 2.0immediatedataproposal > > >Why would any Consumer hook itself on "proprietary" features > and APIs > >is a different question. > > Because it provides a real performance benefit. This is the > same reason apps code to DAPL versus standard sockets. > > - Sean > > _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
