Quoting r. Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: ipoib and core patches for 2.6.17 > > Michael> Yes but only because ipoib_flush_wq_1.patch adds a > Michael> parameter to dev_down, so the conflict is trivial to > Michael> resolve. Can you apply it by hand or do you want to wait > Michael> for me to do it next week? > > I can fix the conflict with no problem. > > But now that I think about it, without ipoib_flush_wq_1.patch, there's > no way for work on that workqueue to bring the device back up. So I > don't think applying ipoib_flush_wq_2.patch makes sense without the > previous patch -- in fact, they really shouldn't be separate patches, > since #2 is just fixing a problem introduced by #1. > > - R.
OK, I'll look into this next week. -- Michael S. Tsirkin Staff Engineer, Mellanox Technologies _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
