On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 23:44 +0200, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > On 11:44 Mon 06 Mar , Jean-Christophe Hugly wrote: > > > > One more detail, I am running with LMC=2 betcause I wanted to check that > > the LMC>0 were fixed (they seem to be; I do not see any LMC-related > > missbehaviour. > > Hmm, and I have the some problems with LMC (even before the test, not > investigated yet)...
I used to have big trouble with LMC>0 (basically duplicate LIDs were being assigned). But seems to be fixed. At least I have not noticed anything like that this time around. > Could you try without LMC? Just did. With lmc=0 the behaviour is the same. Your test's output is: 1: delay 0 2: delay 0 3: delay 0 4: delay 0 5: delay 0 6: delay 0 7: delay 0 8: delay 0 9: delay 675 <nothing after that yet> I guess something happens every 10 minutes or so that puts back osm on track, may be if I wait another 10 or so minutes I'll get a 10th cycle to complete. I will rebuild with the spinlock fixes and see if by any changes it makes a difference to this issue. Oh, btw, the first test I ran with LMC=0 I also put -V on the cmd line. With all the traces going, the tests passes indefinitely (well, I put the end of times at 15 cycles). -- Jean-Christophe Hugly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PANTA _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
