On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 18:44, Jean-Christophe Hugly wrote: > Well, thanks guy ! > > It looks like the spinlocks patch did the trick. The influence of the > broken ref count was reaching further than expected, I guess. At least, > spinlock or something else (can't see what in the svn logs), r5642 works > like a charm. > > The only thing I get that looks a bit disgruntled is this: > > __osm_pi_rcv_process_switch_port: ERR 0F03: Unknown link state = 5, port > = 0x8
5 is a reserved value for PortInfo::PortState (e.g. link state). So either the SMA is returning this (in error) or OpenSM somehow corrupts it after getting it. -- Hal > But it does not seem to hurt. And the port at the other end of the link > seems fine. > > Now, I'll try hard to break the LID assignment and I'll pester you some > more if something comes up. > _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
