On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 14:18, Sean Hefty wrote: > >Aren't there 3 cases possible here: (1) non RMPP request/RMPP response > >(e.g. SA GetTable for one), (2) RMPP request/RMPP response (e.g. SA > >GetMulti), and (3) RMPP request/non RMPP response (I don't think this > >currently exists but may be mistaken). Are all handled on the > >initiator/requester side ? Are the changes only for case (2) ? > > For case 1, we don't have DS RMPP.
I think you mean (we have) non DS RMPP. > For case 2, we have DS RMPP. > > And I don't believe that case 3 exists either, but would end up being treated > as > DS RMPP by the implementation. Why ? Just wondering... > If case 3 doesn't exist, then I think we can > come up with a generic way to identify DS RMPP that doesn't require checking > class or methods. How ? > If case 3 does exist, then I think we'll need class / method > checking to identify DS RMPP. By doesn't exist, do you mean not possible in the architecture or no current use cases like this ? -- Hal > - Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general