> -----Original Message----- > From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 5:50 PM > To: Eitan Zahavi > Cc: Roland Dreier; openib-general@openib.org; Nimrod Gindi; Aviram Gutman; > Sasha Khapyorsky; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Vu Pham; Roland Dreier > Subject: RE: QoS RFC > > On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 10:51, Eitan Zahavi wrote: > > Hi Roland, > > > > > > This is OK but it's sort of a pain to have to query SA ClassPortInfo > > > all the time. Do you have a plan for how to make this transparent to > > ULPs? > > [EZ] Well, a ULP that uses CMA will have it handled by CMA... > > But an old SM implementation that does not support this kind of > > PathRecord extension will probably choke on the new fields once their > > component mask bits are set. > > What do you mean by "choke" ? Wouldn't the new components just be > ignored ? [EZ] By choke I mean - the SA might decide to error the request on invalid parameter. > > > You could however query once for each Client-Reregister event. > > > > > > (BTW something in your email client is really messing up the > > > formatting of your message) > > [EZ] Thanks I will resend . > > > > > > - R. >
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general