On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 12:41, Sean Hefty wrote: > Hal Rosenstock wrote: > >>>and running multiple copies of opensm on different systems. > >> > >>Not sure what that would fail. The other SMs should be standbys. I can't > >>think of what would fail in osmtest off the top of my head but haven't > >>tried this yet but am now about to. > > I was starting / stopping openSM on different systems soon before running the > tests.
Not sure I quite understand the sequencing. > Whenever I started it on one of my systems, it would always become the > master and reassign LIDs. Reassigning LIDs is disruptive. However, this should be made to work. You can avoid this by synchronizing the /var/cache/osm/guid2lid file. > > I think I see what might be going on. To confirm, can you increase the > > transaction timeout on the osmtest side and see if that helps ? > > Something like: > > > > osmtest -f a -t 1000 > > Thanks - I'll try to rerun the tests and see if I get similar behavior. > > The failure I was seeing was while running osmtest -f c. If -c fails, there's no use in running a -a. Your failure is a different scenario than I was envisioning. > If I'm remembering > correctly, the second query of that test wasn't getting a response. Can you run with -V and send me the output ? I want to recreate this so I understand what is going on. -- Hal > - Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
