Am Freitag, den 21.07.2006, 09:42 -0700 schrieb Sean Hefty: > Arne Redlich wrote: > > I only took a rather superficial look at the code. But since the invalid > > GID REJ is treated with such care, I guess it's intentional and not a > > bug? > > I would lean more towards it being a bug. The data in the CM REQ is wrong. > (There's a difference between rejecting a request to another GID, versus the > GID > carried in the request being bogus.) > > In any case, an argument can be made that this change fixes a compliancy > issue > in the IB CM. If the change corrects the problem for you, I will commit it.
Looks good so far - although I've used the patch against 2.6.17.x. Thanks, Arne -- Arne Redlich Xiranet Communications GmbH _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
