Quoting r. Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >Further, why should this API be different from ib_register_client? > >Isn't this confusing? > > It's different from ib_register_client, but more similar to > ib_register_mad_agent. If anything it would make more sense to be closer to > ib_register_mad_agent.
Actually, different from both - we don't get events in the sa_client. We just need a cookie to track queries to synchronise for module unloading. Maybe rename to ib_sa_query_cookie or something? > For example, a callback function makes more sense passed > into a register call than every query call. So ULPs will need multiple clients for multiple types of queries? Ugh. -- MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
