To answer your questions: I'm not totally sure about your application but it seems to me to fall in the category being discussed. Not all of the definitions in ib_types.h are elsewhere. I am working on a patch to get you past this issue. -- Hal
________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 8/14/2006 4:35 PM To: Hal Rosenstock; Michael S. Tsirkin Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; openib-general@openib.org Subject: Re: Conflicting typedefs for "ib_gid_t" >>> I don't think the way forward is using iba/ in all applications. >>> I see it mostly as a legacy header for opensm and related apps >>> that want their own layer for portability between stacks. > > > > I agree with your view on iba/ib_types.h Does that imply that the definitions in iba/ib_types.h are not expected to be required or used by user-space applications other than those categories mentioned above? If iba/ib_types.h is only a legacy header, are the definitions also present in another header file? Madhu _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
