James> Given how many levels down this is, I'm going to change my
James> mind. I think the current explicit include is better than
James> what I suggested.
Thanks, I agree. No sense introducing such a fragile dependency on an
implicit include for such a minimal gain.
- R.
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
