On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 10:00 -0700, Sean Hefty wrote: > >> The ideal fix for this is to include rdma_conn_param as part of the > >> rdma_cm_event. > > > >BTW, wouldn't it be cleaner to just pass it up in the request event? > > Yes - this is what I meant by including it in the rdma_cm_event structure. > > >> However, this breaks every userspace app that's been coded to > >> OFED / SVN. > >> An alternative is to add another call to retrieve the data, but > >> that's not a very clean alternative for new kernel submission. > > > >Another alternative is to version the create ID call. > > Hmm... I need to think about the implementation of this more, but this sounds > like a possibility. Can you provide any details on how you're envisioning > this > working? > > - Sean >
Guys, I must be confused. I thought the private data _was_ passed up in the ESTABLISHED event on the active side. We have tools in the perftools directory that utilize this. What am I missing here? Thanks, Steve. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general