Roland Dreier wrote: > Yes, I would like to see another consumer, just to get a sanity check > that you have implemented the right thing.
I think aiming for 2.6.20 is reasonable, but I'm fine if this doesn't end up making it. I'd like to get it into a branch targeting some kernel release (even if in the -mm branch), and cease maintaining the differences in svn. > Agree -- please do cleanups as separate patches, preferably earlier in > the series (so that it's easier to back out the real change for > testing) There shouldn't be any separate cleanups. Some changes to the synchronization was needed to ensure that ib_free_multicast() was called exactly once. I went back over the changes based on some of Michael's comments, but I'll check again looking for cleanup only portions of the patch. - Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
