Arlin Davis wrote: > Or Gerlitz wrote: >> I see now that the uDAPL CMA provider code uses the MTU 1:1 as >> returned by the SM in the path, so if the env is made of the Mellanox >> PCI-X HCA there can be big BW drop, etc... we have discussed that. >> I wonder how are you overcoming this when running Intel MPI w. OFED 1.0?
> We are not. The problem exists with the CMA provider and OFED 1.0. mmm, I see. >> Also, i understand that OFED includes the uDAPL **SCM** provider, is >> it really tested/supported? if yes, i don't think it needs to be. It >> adds the overhead of one TCP connection per IB connection, creates two >> codes bases to maintain, makes the CMA less tested, you named it. >> If its not tested/supported sure we must not provide it. >> If you agree would you approach the OFED maintainers to remove the SCM >> provider from the udapl OFED 1.1 RPM? > You are correct. There is no need to support SCM moving forward. Lets move now, i have got disconnect problems/bug report from customer using the OFED/uDAPL/SCM provider, and i realize now its an unsupported library! please act to remove it from OFED 1.1 and on. thanks, Or. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
