Quoting r. Arlin Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: [openib-general] scaling issues, was: uDAPL cma: add support for > address and route retries, call disconnect when recving dreq > > Sean Hefty wrote: > > >One option is having the SA (or ib_umad?) return a busy status in response > >to a > >MAD, but we'd still have to be able to send this response as quickly as > >requests > >are being received. We could then limit the number of requests that would > >be > >queued in the kernel for a user. > > > > > > Another great option would be to have path record caching. Unfortunately > OFED 1.1 did not include ib_local_sa in the release. >
This won't help you much. With 256 nodes all to all already gives you 65000 requests which is the same order of magnitude as the reported 130000. -- MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
