Bub Thomas wrote: > Setting the hop_limit from 64 down to 0 or 1 solved the problem. :-) > Don't ask me where I got that hop_limit from, it must have been an > example I found somewhere. > Can you explain why that hop_limit/is_global makes a difference in > communication between gen1 and gen2? Does the counterpart need to have > the same hop_limit?
The gen2 stack uses a hop_limit > 0 to indicate that global routing is being used. If the hop_limit is > 0, then the global routing information must be valid. > The path record values I use are queried from the OSM using a > SERVICE_RECORD query followed by a path record query. > I'm not using any alternate path record values, is this critical? Everything is supposed to work with the path records returned from the SM. I was wondering if you were querying for the path record, modifying the returned value, or creating a path record yourself. > path_record.packet_life_time = 0; I would set this higher (maybe between 12-20, with: 18 = 1 second, 19 = 2 seconds, 20 = 4 seconds, etc.) _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
