> > this is now returning a pointer to the MAD layer's internal QP. I > > guess this is OK -- the only user of the pointer seems to be the mthca > > MAD_IFC command, which just grabs the QP number anyway. But I just > > wanted to point out this wart... > > What's the problem with this?
It's a bit of a layering violation -- a consumer uses the MAD layer through the agent abstraction and so on, and then ends up getting a pointer to the MAD layer's QP struct. I don't think it's really a big deal but it's worth pointing out. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
