> Quoting Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ofed_1_2 Changes to kernel_patches/ for ChelsioT3
> Support.
>
>
> > What if its already built in and export in the kernel we're trying to
> > load into? Will this cause a load problem? I was assuming it
> > would...that's why I changed the names. Am I wrong?
>
> BTW, if you want to change a definition of an existing symbol,
> you can use macro trick like the folowing (this is from
> ./2.6.9_U2/include/net/sock.h):
>
> static inline
> void sock_init_data_new(struct socket *sock, struct sock *sk)
> {
> sock_init_data(sock, sk);
> sk->sk_owner = THIS_MODULE;
> }
>
> #define sock_init_data sock_init_data_new
Another final note: I am not sure it makes sense to try supporting
2.6.20 with CONFIG_GENERIC_ALLOCATOR turned off.
Distributions typically just enable everything so I think this won't
be a problem in practice.
What do you think?
--
MST
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
