>>>What about 259 ? >> >>Same as above. > > > Aren't those all in the spec ?
Yes - I just didn't want to define everything until we had a basic framework that was agreed upon. We can add support for other traps through separate patches. For notices, I did not 'unpack' the data detail section, since that involves decoding the notice itself, and creates a mess of ib_field definitions. I choose instead to leave this up to the consumer. So, I defined traps that I thought were most useful, plus enough to show how additional traps could be defined. >>>Component mask is meaningless for InformInfo so these shouldn't be >>>needed. >> >>That's a good point. These should be removed. (I had defined them before I >>realized component mask was ignored for InformInfo.) > > > Yes, thanks. I've removed these definitions from my git tree. - Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
