> Quoting Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4 of 5] IB/mthca: QoS support > > On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 14:09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > Quoting Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4 of 5] IB/mthca: QoS support > > > > > > On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 09:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > encode SL in sched_queue field to improve hardware QoS guarantees > > > > for connected QPs. > > > > > > Is UD already handled properly in terms of mthca ? > > > > It's not the question of "proper" handling - this patch is an enhancement, > > not really a bug fix. I think mthca already does the best it can with UD > > AVs. > > So there are no scheduling parameters or anything else that needs > tweaking in mthca in terms of the SL for UD AVs ? Just want to be sure.
Not that I know. -- MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
