On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Sean Hefty wrote:
> > And my claim is that you should define private data format to go with this > > other reason otherwise you are not really solving the problem. > > This is not a consumer issued reject. It is a CM issued reject, so > the private data is ignored. This is no different than several > other reject reasons (like invalid service ID). At best we could > define the ARI, but if we knew what the contents of the ARI should > be, then we should use a more specific reject reason than 'other'. Invalid Service ID (8) appears to be an appropriate Reason value for the case when a REQ is received for a service ID that is not registered with the CM (either because the application crashed or exited on its own accord). I agree that if the reason codes are insufficient we should take this up in the IBTA. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
